Widow recieves compensation after husband's stomach is wrongly removed in surgical error

A man whose stomach was mistakenly removed by surgeons has been given a six-figure compensation payout.
John Ford, from Bloxwich in Walsall was 68 when he was misdiagnosed with stomach cancer.
But after his stomach was removed it discovered the hospital pathologist had misdiagnosed tests and Mr Ford had only a benign tumour. This required little more than careful monitoring.
Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust admitted liabilityfor breach of duty of care.
Mr Ford now suffers from constant pain and discomfort.
"I am either constipated or have diarrhoea and am afraid to leave the house in case I need a bathroom," said John.
His operation was carried out at Walsall Manor Hospital in October 2002.
The pathologist involved had been on loan from the Wolverhampton trust.
Specialist cancer misdiagnosis solicitor Timothy Deeming, acting for Mr Ford said:
"Of particular concern is that the pathologist completely missed the main features associated with stomach cancer."
"This failure has led to John not only suffering unnecessary distress after the misdiagnosis of stomach cancer but also further pain and permanent damage after his stomach was needlessly removed."
BackRelated news stories
- 17/08/2006: Cancer misdiagnosis - family of man who died after doctors failed to diagnose cancer receive compensation
- 28/07/2006: Lung cancer mis-diagnosis - lung cancer patients given all clear
- 24/01/2006: Breast cancer misdiagnosis - women wrongly given the all-clear at two hospitals in Manchester
If you believe that you might have a legal claim relating to this story, please complete the online enquiry form or call 0870 024 0558. Your enquiry will be forwarded to a solicitor who specialises in this area.
If you have any comments in relation to this story, please use the online discussion forum.
This news section contains stories of interest to our clients from publicly available news sources. Where we are representing the clients referred to in the news material we will say so. Where we do not represent individuals or bodies mentioned or quoted, the inclusion of the news story in our news section is not intended nor should it be taken to imply that we act for the individual or body concerned.
