
A former professor of medical ethics has called for all forms of euthanasia to be legalised.
Len Doyal, ex-member of the British Medical Association ethics committee, said doctor-assisted deaths did take place and should be better regulated.
He said the law should be changed to enable doctors to withdraw treatment without patients' consent.
But other experts said patients should make a living will if they do not want to be resuscitated.
Professor Doyal said that when doctors withdraw life-sustaining treatment from severely incompetent patients, such as those in a permanent vegetative state (PVS), it was effectively euthanasia, the Clinical Ethics journal reported.
Lord Joffe's Euthanasia Bill which was debated in the House of Lords in May would give doctors the right to prescribe drugs that a terminally ill patient in severe pain could use to end their own life - known as assisted dying.
Patient organisation Dignity in Dying welcomed Professor Doyal's thoughts in the case of competent patients but said that the law did not need to be changed for non-competent patients.
The British Medical Association (BMA) dropped it's opposition to assisted dying in July voting to adopt a neutral stance on the issue.
BackRelated news stories
- 17/05/2006: Right to life case - Leslie Burke lodges appeal at European Court of Human Rights
- 15/05/2006: Right to die - Lords vote against bill which advocates assisted dying
- 30/01/2006: Right to treatment - 'champions' to have say over treatment
- 10/10/2005: Right-to-die debated in House of Lords
- 01/07/2005: BMA rules on right to life - right to die
- 06/06/2005: Ethics expert calls for guidelines over resuscitation of premature babies
If you believe that you might have a legal claim relating to this story, please complete the online enquiry form or call 0870 024 0558. Your enquiry will be forwarded to a solicitor who specialises in this area.
If you have any comments in relation to this story, please use the online discussion forum.
This news section contains stories of interest to our clients from publicly available news sources. Where we are representing the clients referred to in the news material we will say so. Where we do not represent individuals or bodies mentioned or quoted, the inclusion of the news story in our news section is not intended nor should it be taken to imply that we act for the individual or body concerned.
