
The Government has said that it will challenge a Law Lords ruling on the amount of compensation payable to victims of an asbestos-related disease.
In May the House of Lords ruled that widows of men who had died form an asbestos-related disease would not be able to receive full compensation.
They made the ruling after considering the case of Barker - a widow whose husband died after exposure to asbestosas a steelworker.
The ruling affects thousands of widows whose husbands died will have to wait longer for compensation, and will be entitled to less.
Specialist asbestos solicitor Adrian Budgen said:
"We thoroughly welcome the Prime Minister's comments. The Barker Judgment from the House of Lords punishes the Cancer sufferer, whilst saving money for negligent companies and their insurers."
Mesothelioma is a fatal cancer of the lung lining which develops as a result of inhaling asbestos dust.
Mesothelioma can take between ten and sixty years to develop after exposure to asbestos.
Many men who worked in dockyards in the sixties developed mesothelioma in later life as a result of exposure to asbestos.
BackRelated news stories
- 20/07/2006: Government measures to speed up compensation for mesothelioma sufferers
- 26/06/2006: Victims of asbestos related diseases banned access to drug Alimta
- 01/02/2006: Action Mesothelioma Day
- 26/01/2006: Sufferers of pleural plaques will not get compensation
- 06/01/2006: Asbestos related diseases - solicitor Geraldine Coombs advises on making a claim
- 01/11/2005: Lung cancer awareness month
- 06/06/2005: Asbestos claims still to peak
If you believe that you might have a legal claim relating to this story, please complete the online enquiry form or call 0870 024 0558. Your enquiry will be forwarded to a solicitor who specialises in this area.
If you have any comments in relation to this story, please use the online discussion forum.
This news section contains stories of interest to our clients from publicly available news sources. Where we are representing the clients referred to in the news material we will say so. Where we do not represent individuals or bodies mentioned or quoted, the inclusion of the news story in our news section is not intended nor should it be taken to imply that we act for the individual or body concerned.
